Eingangspost:
I know there were a couple threads a couple years ago. I have spent maybe 40 hours on this, so I thought it was time to share. I have more, but didn't want to make a book out of this post.
There have been 4 papers out of Spain that say a large amount of Fungus was found in all ALS brains. Here are 2.
Corpora Amylacea of Brain Tissue from Neurodegenerative Diseases Are Stained with Specific Antifungal Antibodies
Evidence for Fungal Infection in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Brain Tissue from Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Fusarium is the fungus we believe is at the route of the problem. It is a type of Trichothecene Mycotoxin (see CDC ) and it is known to alter SOD1.
Meanwhile Dr. William Reid (discussed on this forum previously) has the same fungal hypothesis. His background is in weaponry. He had decent success with 10 ALS patients using anti-fungal and plasma exchange, but his case study has not been accepted. Yes I know 10 isn't 200, but it has to start somewhere. You can read his patent here.
His process is
1) blood and urine work and look for an elevated anion gap and potential poisons
2) a treatment of Voriconazole followed by
3) Plasma Exchange.
Note that I read people have done #2 or #3. The key is both. One kills the fungus, one tries to remove the poison. Note however that after the voriconazole is stopped, it seemed to come back. Why? Nothing is strong enough to kill 100% of the fungus. These fungus are measured in NG. As in 1/10000000000th (see CDC link above). (Read till the end about a possible stronger solution)
What is NP001? Not Sodium Chlorite, that is for sure.
Which leads me to my next point: Meanwhile a leading Phase 2 trials is NP001. Which they claim is Sodium Chlorite (which I will correct later). I didn't see anywhere in the company's literature anything about a Fungal theory. But why not market a drug, tell people it does X, while you know the real case is Y, so people won't try other ways to treat Y. What does Sodium Chlorite kill... everything, including fungus.
So is it not possible that NP001 works on people because it is killing the fungus? Maybe adding the plasma exchange would help or be necessary.
Supposedly NP001 is a "drug" (google for open trails now 2016/2017). And many have hunted for what NP001 is in the patents and in the trials. A deep dive might lead to PALS to find it is "Sodium Chlorite" (SC) via IV. But the real secret is that they also sometimes disclose "with a PH buffer". What does that mean? The PH is off so it is too strong and won't interact well with the blood. So they have to add some acid, like citric acid. What they don't tell you is this converts it to a new molecule. It ceases to become Sodium Chlorite and becomes... drum roll... Chlorine Dioxide (CD) also known as CLO2.
No, they couldn't just say they are using CD because:
a) you can't patent it,
b) it is cheap, as in $50 a year's supply
They can't with a straight face tell people on their website "Don't drink CD because it is dangerous". Yes their website says not to drink SC, because it is dangerous. That is true, with many scary links. But since they are using CD, why not show links to that being dangerous? Because it is not. See Chlorine dioxide is a size-selective antimicrobial agent. Where they write "the solution killing microbes rapidly does not cause any harm to humans or to animals."
ALS FORUMS on OSC
While I have seen many discussions of PALS doing home experiments using Oral SC (OSC) (the problem being it kills off the good and the bad in the gut, ie too strong, even if you dilute it), but little to no discussion about PALS experimenting with Oral CD (I guess "OCD" acronym doesn't work well). By the way, Oral CD, just happens to be... drum roll, the same as MMS.
WHAT IS "MMS" Miracle or Chlorine Dioxide?
The "Miracle Mineral Supplement" is the given name. Ok, I guess some will immediately discredit it because it has the word "Miracle" in it. Would you have believed it more if they called it MQ001? Let's get over that. Then others might dismiss it because the leader seems a little off. Jim Humble. But imagine if you were him. If (bare with me) you did find something that works for 100s of diseases, and the mainstream press said you were crazy?
Look at the 20/20 Expose, full of the 90s style journalism where a reporter walks up to somebody in a parking lot and says "how do you feel about killing people." It was severely 1 sided and biased. They make fun of the fact that he does all this through a church, implying a cult. But fail to mention that the church was a strategy to get the FDA off their back. Call it a sacrament, and the FDA can't shut them down. The biggest bias is when people call it "Industrial bleach". As opposed to what? Regular bleach? Industrial means concentrated. You can't say "this is super concentrated stuff, that you put 1 drop into a gallon", it stops being "industrial". You could also say your water supply has "industrial bleach" in it. It doesn't, it has a couple drops per whatever.
A few weeks later a ABC affiliate decided to be a little more investigation and cover both sides. They found the Bionic Woman that claims to be cured using MMS. Hum... why didn't 20/20 find ONE person claiming benefit? That isn't journalism.
Anyhow, I just wanted to explain all the connections. NP001, SD, OSC, CD, MMS, they might/should/could work against... fungus. The question is whether you can take enough of the CD orally to get to the brain to kill the fungus. Some say no, Jim H says yes. And for those that ask "why are their no clinical trials for Oral CD", tell me, who would do it? Who will spend $1m-$2m to "prove" a product that costs $50 a year? No drug company would invest in that. (Unless they were clever and thought to do it via IV and call it something else, ie NP001)
My ask is, has anybody here used MMS or Oral CD, or CD via IV?
Has anybody here gotten tested for fungal infections?
This is what we are trying
1) Blood and Urine testing for fungus
2) If any is found, then try the Reid Protocol of Vorconozole followed by more bloodwork
3) If the bloodwork changes, showing Fungus/Poison was reduced, then do plasma exchange.
4) If she gets better and it comes back (because we know V won't kill 100% of it, and we have seen that happen before), then consider MMS, Oral CD.
Thoughts? (I have 21 papers that support above if you want to see them)
Frank in Va
There have been 4 papers out of Spain that say a large amount of Fungus was found in all ALS brains. Here are 2.
Corpora Amylacea of Brain Tissue from Neurodegenerative Diseases Are Stained with Specific Antifungal Antibodies
Evidence for Fungal Infection in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Brain Tissue from Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Fusarium is the fungus we believe is at the route of the problem. It is a type of Trichothecene Mycotoxin (see CDC ) and it is known to alter SOD1.
Meanwhile Dr. William Reid (discussed on this forum previously) has the same fungal hypothesis. His background is in weaponry. He had decent success with 10 ALS patients using anti-fungal and plasma exchange, but his case study has not been accepted. Yes I know 10 isn't 200, but it has to start somewhere. You can read his patent here.
His process is
1) blood and urine work and look for an elevated anion gap and potential poisons
2) a treatment of Voriconazole followed by
3) Plasma Exchange.
Note that I read people have done #2 or #3. The key is both. One kills the fungus, one tries to remove the poison. Note however that after the voriconazole is stopped, it seemed to come back. Why? Nothing is strong enough to kill 100% of the fungus. These fungus are measured in NG. As in 1/10000000000th (see CDC link above). (Read till the end about a possible stronger solution)
What is NP001? Not Sodium Chlorite, that is for sure.
Which leads me to my next point: Meanwhile a leading Phase 2 trials is NP001. Which they claim is Sodium Chlorite (which I will correct later). I didn't see anywhere in the company's literature anything about a Fungal theory. But why not market a drug, tell people it does X, while you know the real case is Y, so people won't try other ways to treat Y. What does Sodium Chlorite kill... everything, including fungus.
So is it not possible that NP001 works on people because it is killing the fungus? Maybe adding the plasma exchange would help or be necessary.
Supposedly NP001 is a "drug" (google for open trails now 2016/2017). And many have hunted for what NP001 is in the patents and in the trials. A deep dive might lead to PALS to find it is "Sodium Chlorite" (SC) via IV. But the real secret is that they also sometimes disclose "with a PH buffer". What does that mean? The PH is off so it is too strong and won't interact well with the blood. So they have to add some acid, like citric acid. What they don't tell you is this converts it to a new molecule. It ceases to become Sodium Chlorite and becomes... drum roll... Chlorine Dioxide (CD) also known as CLO2.
No, they couldn't just say they are using CD because:
a) you can't patent it,
b) it is cheap, as in $50 a year's supply
They can't with a straight face tell people on their website "Don't drink CD because it is dangerous". Yes their website says not to drink SC, because it is dangerous. That is true, with many scary links. But since they are using CD, why not show links to that being dangerous? Because it is not. See Chlorine dioxide is a size-selective antimicrobial agent. Where they write "the solution killing microbes rapidly does not cause any harm to humans or to animals."
ALS FORUMS on OSC
While I have seen many discussions of PALS doing home experiments using Oral SC (OSC) (the problem being it kills off the good and the bad in the gut, ie too strong, even if you dilute it), but little to no discussion about PALS experimenting with Oral CD (I guess "OCD" acronym doesn't work well). By the way, Oral CD, just happens to be... drum roll, the same as MMS.
WHAT IS "MMS" Miracle or Chlorine Dioxide?
The "Miracle Mineral Supplement" is the given name. Ok, I guess some will immediately discredit it because it has the word "Miracle" in it. Would you have believed it more if they called it MQ001? Let's get over that. Then others might dismiss it because the leader seems a little off. Jim Humble. But imagine if you were him. If (bare with me) you did find something that works for 100s of diseases, and the mainstream press said you were crazy?
Look at the 20/20 Expose, full of the 90s style journalism where a reporter walks up to somebody in a parking lot and says "how do you feel about killing people." It was severely 1 sided and biased. They make fun of the fact that he does all this through a church, implying a cult. But fail to mention that the church was a strategy to get the FDA off their back. Call it a sacrament, and the FDA can't shut them down. The biggest bias is when people call it "Industrial bleach". As opposed to what? Regular bleach? Industrial means concentrated. You can't say "this is super concentrated stuff, that you put 1 drop into a gallon", it stops being "industrial". You could also say your water supply has "industrial bleach" in it. It doesn't, it has a couple drops per whatever.
A few weeks later a ABC affiliate decided to be a little more investigation and cover both sides. They found the Bionic Woman that claims to be cured using MMS. Hum... why didn't 20/20 find ONE person claiming benefit? That isn't journalism.
Anyhow, I just wanted to explain all the connections. NP001, SD, OSC, CD, MMS, they might/should/could work against... fungus. The question is whether you can take enough of the CD orally to get to the brain to kill the fungus. Some say no, Jim H says yes. And for those that ask "why are their no clinical trials for Oral CD", tell me, who would do it? Who will spend $1m-$2m to "prove" a product that costs $50 a year? No drug company would invest in that. (Unless they were clever and thought to do it via IV and call it something else, ie NP001)
My ask is, has anybody here used MMS or Oral CD, or CD via IV?
Has anybody here gotten tested for fungal infections?
This is what we are trying
1) Blood and Urine testing for fungus
2) If any is found, then try the Reid Protocol of Vorconozole followed by more bloodwork
3) If the bloodwork changes, showing Fungus/Poison was reduced, then do plasma exchange.
4) If she gets better and it comes back (because we know V won't kill 100% of it, and we have seen that happen before), then consider MMS, Oral CD.
Thoughts? (I have 21 papers that support above if you want to see them)
Frank in Va
Kommentar